Optibet Latvijas Čempionāts 2024-2025

Optibet Latvijas Čempionāts 2024-2025 play-off

Optibet Latvijas Čempionāts 2024-2025 Best players WING SPIKER
PlayerPlayedBlockBlockServeServeAttackAttackReceptionReceptionRanking
  MS#=/TotBl ind.Bl ind.#=/TotSv ind.Sv ind.#=/TotSp ind.Sp ind.#=/TotRc ind.Rc ind.Index

1

Rokjāns Armands
(Jēkabpils Lūši)

3

10

6

7

0

14

0,0131

0,0131

9

9

4

43

0,0284

0,0284

23

5

6

59

2,0339

2,0339

6

1

1

36

0,6667

0,6667

0,40558

2

Wilson Kyle
(Ezerzeme/Daugavpils Universitāte)

7

25

11

24

1

51

0,0097

0,0097

3

25

5

82

0,0071

0,0071

99

22

18

190

7,7632

7,7632

50

6

20

191

0,5969

0,5969

0,29978

3

Vanags Toms
(Robežsardze / Riga)

6

21

8

12

2

28

0,0085

0,0085

6

15

4

96

0,0106

0,0106

69

13

20

164

4,6098

4,6098

32

4

10

94

0,5638

0,5638

0,29766

4

Pinka Patriks
(Robežsardze / Riga)

6

21

7

15

1

29

0,0074

0,0074

4

9

5

70

0,0096

0,0096

63

16

14

169

4,1006

4,1006

44

4

4

144

0,7708

0,7708

0,28534

5

Voroņko Ēriks
(Ezerzeme/Daugavpils Universitāte)

7

25

6

12

0

40

0,0053

0,0053

5

9

3

88

0,0071

0,0071

65

19

16

173

4,3353

4,3353

17

2

10

83

0,5542

0,5542

0,26263

6

Šalkovskis Matīss
(VK Piejūra / MSĢ)

2

5

0

3

0

4

0

0

4

6

0

20

0,015

0,015

12

5

0

29

1,2069

1,2069

7

2

0

22

0,4545

0,4545

0,25596

7

Stieģelis Eduards
(Jēkabpils Lūši)

3

10

1

4

0

9

0,0022

0,0022

2

5

3

31

0,0109

0,0109

18

5

8

52

0,9615

0,9615

10

5

8

64

0,3594

0,3594

0,25046

8

Andrejevs Ralfs
(VK Piejūra / MSĢ)

1

3

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

6

0,0075

0,0075

4

2

2

13

0

0

15

3

2

26

0,5385

0,5385

0,22328

9

Štolcs Leo Aleksandrs
(Jēkabpils Lūši)

2

3

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

2

3

0,0062

0,0062

1

2

1

4

-1,5

-1,5

4

1

1

12

0,3333

0,3333

0,21794

10

Blumbergs Ingars
(VK Piejūra / MSĢ)

2

4

0

4

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

8

0

0

7

1

1

17

1,1765

1,1765

6

3

0

21

0,4762

0,4762

0,19948

11

Smirnovs Pāvels
(Ezerzeme/Daugavpils Universitāte)

6

15

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

21

0,001

0,001

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

2

1

14

0,4286

0,4286

0,19909

12

Jaundžeikars Kārlis
(Jēkabpils Lūši)

2

4

0

1

0

3

0

0

0

1

0

2

0

0

4

0

2

10

0,8

0,8

1

0

0

8

0,5

0,5

0,19569

13

Teikmanis Jānis
(Robežsardze / Riga)

2

2

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0,19569

14

Storķis Dāvis
(Robežsardze / Riga)

2

3

0

1

0

3

0

0

0

2

0

5

0

0

2

1

0

6

0,5

0,5

1

1

0

6

0,6667

0,6667

0,19569

Ranking Calculation

Wing-spiker

the ranking takes into account:

  • Serve Index (Sv ind.): positive serves divided the total points of both teams (ranking is available only if the player has made at least one serve per set)

  • Reception Index (Rc ind.): positive receptions minus negative receptions divided the total receptions (ranking is available only if the player has made at least three receptions per set)

  • Attack Index (Sp ind.): positive attacks minus negative attacks divided the total attacks (ranking is available only if the player has made at least three attacks per set)

  • Block Index (Bl ind.): positive blocks divided the total points of both teams

The final ranking is based on the final “index” which determines the impact of the role on the game, in other words the importance of the role towards the win probability. This final Index is calculated considering the indexes for each single skill (“ind.” columns) and a coefficient which indicates the “importance” of the role to determine the probability of success for the team. Each single skill index is calculated considering the positive and negative skills based on the number of points played from the teams and multiplied for a coefficient which indicates the importance of the skill for that role to determine the probability of success for the team. The icons next to each skill column give an idea about the “weight” of the skill determining the probability of success for the team in this role. The final Index is calculated also considering the following criteria:

  • Minimum number of Serves per set:  1

  • Minimum number of Receptions per set:  3

  • Minimum number of Spikes per set:  3

Serve

  • # serve ace

  • / half point

  • #NOME?

Reception

  • # perfect

  • / half point

  • #NOME?

Attack

  • # point

  • / blocked

  • #NOME?

Block

  • # point

  • / Net touch

  • #NOME?

Filters applied

  • Minimum number of Matches played:  1